Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81591/2024bail granted

Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81591 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Golu Kumar Son of Mahesh Kumar Bhagat Resident of Vilage- Himmat Patti, P.S.- Sahebganj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, motorcycle of the informant bearing Registration No.- BR05AR-5340 containing mobile phone and Rs. 4,000/- in the dickey was stolen away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81591 of 2024(2) dt.03-12-2024 2/2 FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of his own confessional statement recorded in Kesariya P.S. Case No. 77 of 2024 also on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused Vikash Kumar and same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no stolen article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T