Farzana v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82876 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2023 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Farzana Daughter Of Fartul Resident Of Village - Rangraihiya, Lal Toli, P.S. - Amour, District - Purnea 2.

Ashna Daughter Of Fartul Resident Of Village - Rangraihiya, Lal Toli, P.S. - Amour, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the husband of the informant by tying a rope around his neck.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that the deceased was married

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82876 of 2023(3) dt.06-02-2024 2/2 person and as per allegation though it is not correct the deceased was fallen in love with the petitioner no. 1 and went at her house. There is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence to show the complicity of the petitioners. On the basis of suspicion, petitioners have been implicated in the present case. There is no specific overt act against these petitioners. They are languishing in judicial custody since 26.04.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Purnea in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 109 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T