Ranjan Manjhi @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77422 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2025 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ranjan Manjhi @ Ranjan Kumar S/O Vijay Manjhi @ Bijay Manjhi R/O Village- Koshiyawan, P.S- Pali, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 74, 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, this petitioner gave knife blow to the informant due to which, the tip of informant's nose got separated.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. On account of petty dispute, a simple scuffle took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77422 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that this petitioner caused grievous injury by inflicting knife blow to the informant due to which tip of nose of informant got separated.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T