Kailas Yadav @ Kallu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82106 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Kailas Yadav @ Kallu Yadav, S/O Late Karam Yadav, R/O Village- Itahari, P.S- Mohanpur, Distt.- Gaya, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Munni Devi, W/O Ravindra Paswan, R/O Village- Itahari, P.S- Mohanpur, Distt.- Gaya, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354-B, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w)(i) and 3(2)(v-a) of SC/ST(POA) Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that certain boys who are named in the F.I.R. attempted to molest the daughter of the informant. It is further alleged that when the informant went to complain to the guardian, this petitioner abused with her caste name and also threatened of dire consequences.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82106 of 2024(4) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The only allegation agaisnt the petitioner is that he is guardian of one of those boys and that he has abused the informant with caste name and has threatened of dire consequences. He is languishing in judicial custody since 05.09.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO-cum-Additional Sessions JudgeVII, Gaya in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T