Rohit Kumar @ Khikhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78761 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Khikhar S/O Tun-Tun Singh R/O Village- Rajoun Chowk Ward No. 1, P.S- Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that he along with his cousin brother was going to the station on 15-62025 for catching a train for joining their job at Madhya Pradesh, when on the way they were intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioner along with 10 unknown accused and accused persons assaulted his cousin by butt of pistol causing injury on head, while Manas assaulted the informant by stone causing injury on head.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78761 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner had instituted Lakhisarai PS Case no. 287 of 2025 dated 15-6-2025 against the father of the informant, as such he came to be implicated in the instant case with general and omnibus allegations. It is also submitted that the instant FIR is a counter-blast to the Lakhisarai PS Case No. 287 of 2025.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 289 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T