← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81134/2023bail granted

Anil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-22Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81134 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2023 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== ANIL CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE DOMAN CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - FIROJPUR, P.S. - ATRI, DISTRICT - GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 45 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. As per prosecution case, 10 litre country made Mahua liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner. Local villager disclosed the name of the present petitioner and others who succeeded in fleeing away from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him in F.I.R. and he has falsely been implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81134 of 2023(2) dt.22-12-2023 2/3 in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2023 and bears no criminal antecedent. He further submits that co-accused Dharmendra Chaudhary and Sunil Chaudhary have already been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 32486 of 2023 and the case of present petitioner stands more or less on similar footing. Petitioner is not apprehended on the spot.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, petitioner is not apprehended on the spot, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, co-accused has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 45 of 2023, subject to following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81134 of 2023(2) dt.22-12-2023 3/3 (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- U T