← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17196/2023dismissed

Md. Izharul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17196 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Izharul Haque son of Manjur Alam, Resident of Village-Satkauwa, P.S.- Dighal Bank, District-Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Addl. Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Addl. Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj, District-Kishanganj. 4.

The District Education Officer, Kishanganj.

5.

The Sub Divisional Education Officer, Dighal Bank Sub Division, DistrictKishanganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Singh, G.P.-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. This writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondent to transfer the post recorded at Serial No.07 (Sonapur) to Village-Satkauwa within the Sub Division of Dighal Bank.

(ii) For directing the respondent to conduct detailed enquiry into the irregularity committed in the process of

Patna High Court CWJC No.17196 of 2023(2) dt.11-09-2025 2/2 selections of schools/Tola in the SubDivision of Dighal Bank. (iii) For issuance of writ in the nature of writ of prohibition or any other writ order or direction restraining the Respondents to proceed with the appointment of Siksha Sevak within the Sub Division of Dighal Bank without conducting detailed enquiry into the irregularities committed by the respondents in distribution of post within the Sub Division.

3. In the opinion of this Court, this writ petition is not maintainable.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move the Chief Secretary by filing a representation.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Neha/- U