← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81377/2024bail rejected

Kunal Kishor @ Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-11Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81377 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Kunal Kishor @ Kunal Kumar Son of Kishor Kumar Gupta Village- Gandhi Chowk, Near Mahavir Asthan, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the State :

Ms.Anita Kumari For the informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2024

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sahebganj Police Station Case No. 242 of 2024, dated 12.05.2024, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 302/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the sister of the informant (now deceased) on 08.03.2008 and their two children were studying in boarding school, at Gorakhpur. It has been alleged that for the past 4-5 years, the petitioner had developed illicit relationship with one Dolly Jaiswal, which was being objected by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81377 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/2 deceased, due to which the petitioner along with others killed the deceased.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He further submits that the deceased has committed suicide by jumping from the roof. He further submits that the petitioner informed the informant about the death of the deceased and the informant participated in the funeral of his sister and later on, lodged the First Information Report.

5. Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the gravity of the offence and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. This application is, accordingly, dismissed (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √