Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27959 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2018 Thana- DANIYAWA District- Patna ====================================================== Uday Yadav, S/o Shyam Babu Yadav, resident of Village- Nimi, P.S.- Daniawan, District- Patna presently residing at Gadhochak Zafrabad Fatuha, Ward No. 2, P.S. Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate Sri Gautam Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2018 Heard Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri Gautam Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner , learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Abhay Kumar, learned counsel for informant. The sole petitioner, apprehending his arrest in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 39 of 2018, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 385 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, has prayed for grant bail in the event of his arrest or surrender.

Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner tried to persuade the Court that there is no specific accusation against petitioner and it is a fit case for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27959 of 2018(3) dt.16-05-2018 2/2 granting anticipatory bail. However, after examination of the F.I.R. it is evident that there is specific accusation against petitioner that he fired from his rifle which hit the thigh of the informant.

Considering the specific accusation against petitioner, there is no reason to pass favourable order. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T