Neelmani Nischal Kumar @ Babul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17965 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Neelmani Nischal Kumar @ Babul Son of Sri Maheshwari Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Baruna, P.O.- Chorbar, P.S.- Ariyari, DistrictSheikhpura. 2.

Neelmani Nischal Kumar Alis Babul Maheshwari Prasad Singh VillBaruna,P.O-Chorbar,P.S-Ariyari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura.

4.

The Additional Collector, Sheikhpura.

5.

The District Education Officer, Sheikhpura.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Sheikhpura. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura. 8.

The Block Education Officer, Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura. 9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Baruna, P.O.- Chorwar, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura.

10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Baruna, Ariyari, P.O.- Chorwar, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura. 11.

Kumari Neelam, Wife of Shatrughan Chandra Sidhartha, Daughter of Shiv Nandan Ram Resident of Village- Baruna, P.O.- Chorwar, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :

AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to learned Advocate General.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some arguments realizing his difficulty, seeks

Patna High Court CWJC No.17965 of 2024(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to assail the order impugned in the instant writ application before the State Appellate Authority in accordance with law.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. It is made clear that if any appeal is filed assailing the order impugned in the instant writ application and issue of limitation arises, the learned State Appellate Authority shall keep in mind that petitioners were pursuing their remedy before this Court.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U