Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78006/2025dismissed

Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78006 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Ashok Yadav S/O Bisho Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Visho @ Vishnudev Yadav R/o Village- Dhuriya Sautari, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Chausa, DistrictMadhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 23.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21045 of 2025.

4. The following order was passed on 23.04.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 21045 of 2025, which reads as under: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78006 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2025.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed."

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that out of six witnesses, three witnesses have been examined.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T