Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71481/2019bail granted

Biranchi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71481 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2017 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== BIRANCHI YADAV Son of Jhari Yadav Resident of Village- Neema Nawada, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Earlier bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 08.04.2019 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22073 of 2019 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant in his written complaint has alleged inflicting sword blow on his neck by petitioner causing grievous injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 26.02.2019 and has completed more than six months of judicial custody.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71481 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 130 of 2017, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U