Patna High CourtCWJC/9165/2018disposed

Tej Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9165 of 2018 =========================================================== Tej Narayan Singh, Son of Late Musaheb Singh, Resident of Mohalla Professor Colony, P.S. Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur, Through its Registrar.

3. The Vice Chancellor, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur.

4. The Registrar, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur.

5. The Deputy Registrar, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur.

6. The Finance Officer, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur.

7. The Principal B.M.D. College Dayalpur, District Vaishali. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and B.R.A. Bihar University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus direction to the respondents to make payment of post retiral benefits i.e. Gratuity amount, Earned Leave Encashment and any other admissible benefits to the petitioner along with bank rate interest computed from the dated of retirement who retired on 31.7.2016 from the post of Associate Professor, department of

Patna High Court CWJC No.9165 of 2018 dt.14-08-2018 2/2 Chemistry, B.M.D. College Dayalpur (B.R.A.

Bihar University Muzaffarpur)."

3. From the pleadings on record, it is not disputed at the Bar that the payment of all admitted retiral benefits of the petitioner have been made.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U