Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80657/2025dismissed

Raju Paswan @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80657 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Paswan @ Raju Kumar son of Kamal Paswan Resident Of VillageKamaldah Ps -Paraiya Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aryan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28709 of 2025, which reads as under:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Four unknown criminals intercepted the informant and on the point of pistol and looted the mobile phone, cash, gold chain etc.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80657 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 The name of the petitioners have transpired during investigation in the self inculpatory statement of co-accused. The petitioners are also accused in six more similar and serious cases. The petitioners are in custody since 07.12.2024.

4. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has started and one witness has been examined.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T