Vibha Devi @ Triphul Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.26 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-478 Year-2023 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vibha Devi @ Triphul Devi Wife Of P. B. Yadav Resident Of Sakin - Tiri, Ward No.4, P.S. - Saur Bazar, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar Patna Bihar 2.

The Director General Of Police, Bihar Patna Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa Bihar 4.

The Deputy Inspector General, Koshi Range, Saharsa Bihar 5.

The Senior Superintendent Of Police (Ssp), Saharsa Bihar 6.

The Superintendent Of Police (Sp), Saharsa Bihar 7.

The Deputy Superintendent Of Police (Dy. Sp), Saharsa Bihar 8.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer (Sdpo), Saharsa Bihar 9.

The Station House Officer (Sho), Saur Bazar, Saharsa Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GP-23 Mr. Sanjay Kumar AC to GP 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

(1) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the Superintendent of Police, Saharsa to complete the investigation of the F.I.R. being Saur Bazar P.S. case No. 478/ 2023 registered u/s 341,342,323,307,504,506/34 Indian Penal Code, under the circumstances

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.26 of 2024(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 that the accused are high profile and influential persons and as such it was not surprising that the investigation in the said case was carried out with an intent to protect them rather than to investigate the offence reported and carry the same to its logical end;

(ii) To hold and declare that the Police authorities till now have conducted biased, partial, incomplete and suborn investigation in order to prepare and arrange escape route to the accused persons.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and this writ petition has become infructuous.

4. In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U