Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77974 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2024 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Sahani Son of Sattan Sahni R/o Village - Bedaulilya, P.S. - Mushahari, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Shekhar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Minapur P.S Case No. 295 of 2024 from the Court of learned JM, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 336(3) of the BNS and under Section 25(1-b)a

3. As per allegation in the FIR, one country-made pistol and two live cartridges and one stolen motorcycle without number plate were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the recovery shown in the seizure list is just

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77974 of 2025(3) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 planted by the police having previous criminal antecedent of the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 06.09.2024 and petitioner has got four criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and case diary, it appears that one country-made pistol and two live cartridges and one stolen motorcycle without number plate were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, petitioner has got four criminal antecedents and these offence are serious in nature.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials available on records and submissions made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T