← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4594/2019allowed

Anuj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4594 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11364 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Anuj Kumar Son of Late Kishori Singh Resident of Village-Hathiwa, P.S. + District-Sheikhpura 2.

Dejy Kumari Wife of Anuj Kumar Resident of Village-Hathiwa, P.S. + District-Sheikhpura.

3.

Pramod Kumar Son of Late Bilayati Singh Resident of Village-Hathiwa, P.S. + District-Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education, Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali, District-Vaishali. 5.

The District Education Officer, Vaishali, District-Vaishali. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Vaishali, District- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (GP 23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard both sides.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to inadvertence, the names of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 have wrongly been typed as the District Magistrate, Vaishali, DistrictVaishali, the District Education Officer, Vaishali, DistrictVaishali and the District Programme Officer(Establishment), Vaishali, District-Vaishali in place of the District Magistrate,

Patna High Court MJC No.4594 of 2019(3) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura, the District Education Officer, Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura and the District Programme Officer(Establishment), Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura in the writ petition.

Having considered the facts, the petitioners are permitted to make correction in the names of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 in C.W.J.C. No.11364 of 2019 and accordingly, the order stands corrected so far it relates to the names of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6. The modification petition is allowed. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U