← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18403/2025disposed

Jitendra Kumar v. The Union Of India

2025-12-04Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18403 of 2025 ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar, Son of Rajendra Prasad, Resident of Village- Bagahi, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Education Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Central Board of Secondary Education through the Regional Officer, Central Board of Secondary Examination Regional Office Ambika Complex Behind State Bank Colony Near Brahmsthan Sheikhpura, Raja Bazar, Baily Road, Patna 800014.

3.

The Regional Officer, Central Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office Ambika Complex Behind State Bank Colony Near Brahmsthan Sheikhpura, Raja Bazar, Baily Road, Patna 800014. 4.

The Bihar School Examination Board, though its Chairman. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Adv.

For the U.O.I.

:

Mr. Ms. Priya Gupta, CGC For the C.B.S.E.

:

Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. V.K.Tripathi, Adv.

For the B.S.E.B.

:

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Adv.

Mr. Mrs. Kalpana, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to correct his father's name in all the educational certificate/records; as on account of inadvertence the nickname/alias name of petitioner's father i.e. Harendra Mahto is mentioned in all the educational certificate/record of the petitioner in place of his original name

Patna High Court CWJC No.18403 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/3 as Rajendra Prasad.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner adverting to the facts noted in the writ petition submitted that the petitioner is son of Rajendra Prasad, but, on account of some inadvertence occurred at the hands of his guardian at the time of admission in the school, in place of Rajendra Prasad, his nickname/alias name has been mentioned as Harendra Mahto and the similar mistake has occurred in all the subsequent places, leading to recording of alias name in the academic certificates.

4. Learned Advocate for the Central Board for Secondary Examination fairly submitted that the Board is bound to issue the certificates based upon the records available and furnished by the School concerned. It is the mandate of the law that the certificate must be in consistent with the school records, hence, necessary correction is required by a competent Court, so that further action could be taken.

5. Considering the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties, this Court finds that no order can be passed unless the petitioner will take appropriate remedy for making necessary correction in the name of his father by a competent Court or the authority.

6. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition stand disposed off.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18403 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 3/3

7. The petitioner shall be at liberty to get the name of his father corrected through the competent Court or authority. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U