Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32609 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2017 Thana -GIRIYAK District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Sangita Devi, W/o Manoj Yadav, Resident of vill- Barchi Bigha, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 25.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32506 of 2017 in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 118 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code and the allegation against the petitioner and other is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that she is lady and has been in custody since 25.05.2017 and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future as uptil now only one witness has been examined.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the fact that petitioner is a lady and has been in judicial custody since 22.04.2017, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32609 of 2018 (4) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 118 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make herself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on her part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T