Deepak Kumar Mehta @ Dimpal Kumar @ Dimpal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75364 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2019 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== DEEPAK KUMAR MEHTA @ DIMPAL KUMAR @ DIMPAL Son of Rudal Mehta @ Rudal Mahto Resident of Village - Paschim Tola Naki Road Chandwa, P.S.- Falka, Distt - Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2019 in connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 304 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457/380/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is only on suspicion that the name of the present petitioner has surfaced and that no recoveries have been made from his possession. It is further submitted that other similarly situated co-accused person who was also named along with the petitioner has since been extended the privilege of regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 78423 of 2019 vide order dated 09.12.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75364 of 2019(3) dt.19-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 1st Katihar, in connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 304/2019, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T