Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77917 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2025 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Son of Mohan Prasad R/o Ward no. 13, Abkari Chowk, Bairgania, P.S. - Bairgania, Dist. - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 27.07.2025 in connection Bairgania P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 27.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (c), 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.

3. Recovery is of 120 bottles of cough syrup.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Infact the petitioner is neither the co-owner nor has any role in running Pooja Medical Hall, near which the recovery has been made and no incriminating articles

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77917 of 2025(5) dt.22-01-2026 2/3 were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that there is non-compliance of the mandatory provision of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act and it appears that the recovered contraband is less than the commercial quantity. Hence, there is no embargo under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S Act for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet. The petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2025.

5 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the petitioner has clean antecedent and that the recovered contraband is less than the commercial quantity, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Sitamarhi in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77917 of 2025(5) dt.22-01-2026 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T