Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78226/2025bail rejected

Madhesh Mistri @ Madhesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Madhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78226 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- BHADHWAR District- Gaya ====================================================== Madhesh Mistri @ Madhesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Madhesh Kumar, S/o Late Bachu Mistry, R/o Village- Bhokha, P.S- Bhadwar, District- Gayajee ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Swati Parmar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bhadhwar P.S. Case no.49 of 2024 registered under sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the daughter of the informant who was married to the petitioner herein was killed by strangulation on account of non-satisfaction of the demand of dowry of the accused persons by way of a motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that he happens to be the husband of the deceased. The deceased committed suicide on account of depression, being issueless. The petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2024 and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78226 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the petitioner being the husband of the deceased, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T