← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36109/2018bail granted

Uchit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-29Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36109 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2017 Thana -HATHIDAH District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Uchit Paswan Son of Biranchi Paswan Resident of Gosaigaon, P.S. Ghoshwari, District- Patna at Present Resident of Dharmpur Bata More P.S. Hathidah District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR of the occurrence of robbery is against unknown.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner nor he was ever put on T.I. Parade. Name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Irfan Ali. The petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2017. Investigation of the case is already closed.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36109 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Hathidah Police Station Case No. 53 of 2017, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner as well as condition that both the bailors shall be resident of within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T