Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78322 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2015 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar, aged about-42 years, S/O Ram Sevak Mahto R/O VillageLadaura, Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 31.03.2015 when the informant was on his way to his house then two persons were talking by covering their face and when informant reached there, the accused persons on the point of pistol asked to get down from his motorcycle and snatched his mobile phone and motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession although the petitioner has been arrested by the Police Officer in this old case on 03.08.2025 and remanded without any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78322 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 information and it is a nine years old case. He next submits that alleged mobile and sim card has been recovered from possession of co-accused person, Sonu Kumar and the coaccused persons, namely, Sonu Kumar and Dharmendra Kumar have already granted bail by the learned Trial Court. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2025 and has got two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No.22 of 2015 with a condition that petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court till conclusion of the trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T