Rajesh Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33978 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2017 Thana -MAINATAND DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Rajesh Ram, Son of Basudeo Ram,
2. Brijesh Ram, Son of Basudeo Ram,
3. Bigu Mahto, Son of Ram Sarali Mahto.
4. Rupesh Ram, Son of Lalman Ram,
5. Gamira Sah, Son of Late Brahmdeo Sah.
6. Jagdish Paswan, Son of Nathuni Paswan.
7. Lal Bihari Paswan, Son of Nathuni Paswan.
8. Pintu Ram, Son of Dhebar Ram,
9. Paras Ram, Son of Late Jaysingh Ram,
10. Chanar Ram, Son of Late Sohan Ram
11. Umesh Ram, Son of Dhuri Ram,
12. Bajrangi Patel, Son of Late Ramawtar Patel.
13. Amit Paswan, Son of Late Ramuna Paswan,
14. Thag Patel, Son of Late Birchha Patel, All are residents of VillageSinghpur, Police Station- Mainatand, District- West Champaran.
15. Bannu Ram, Son of Late Gudar Ram, Resident of village- Bahuarwa, Police Station- Purushottampur, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachida Nand Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mainatand P.S. Case No. 150/2017, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 504 and 403 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33978 of 2018 (3) dt.18-08-2018 2/3 In the written report it is alleged that on the date of occurrence on account of land dispute the petitioners assaulted the informant with lathi and Farsa etc. causing injury to him. Case diary has been received in this case. Injury report of the informant is not available in case diary. From the written report itself, it appears that the occurrence is alleged to have taken place on account of land dispute.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 150/2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33978 of 2018 (3) dt.18-08-2018 3/3 automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T