Amit Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71710 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2019 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== AMIT SAW Son of Devi Saw Resident of Village - Nandnama (Uttarwari Tola Mushari), P.S.- Ramgarh Chowk, Distt - Lakhisarai ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

There is recovery of 134.52 liters of Foreign liquor from the house of one Gautam Kumar Tanti who disclosed that the petitioner, who fled away from the scene, was also having a share in the aforesaid consignment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the confession of co-accused, though he is no way concerned with the said recovery. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71710 of 2019(2) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge Excise, Lakhisarai, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T