Dhrup Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79733 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2025 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Dhrup Kumar S/o Majister Mahto Resident of Village - Bucheya, P.S - Sidhwaliya, District - Gopalganj, Bihar 2.
Majister Mahto S/o Babulal Mahato Resident of Village - Bucheya, P.S - Sidhwaliya, District - Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 76, 352, 351 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 27.04.2025 at 06:30 p.m., 9 named accused persons including the petitioners came and on orders of petitioner no.2, accused Dhrup Kumar assaulted Sachin Kumar by rod twice causing injury on head, further Satrudhan Mahto
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79733 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/3 assaulted Sachin Kumar by Lathi causing injury above his right eye and lips, while Kishnawati Devi dashed his mother on ground and Satrudhan Mahto snatched her chain worth Rs.18,000/-, thereafter Dilip Mahto disrobed her mother and injured were brought to the hospital.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the date of occurrence is 27.04.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 21.05.2025, i.e., after a delay of more than 24 days which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that from side of the petitioners Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No.88 of 2025 was instituted, as such, the instant FIR is a counter blast.
5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79733 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No.91 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T