Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81389/2025bail granted

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81389 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Arvind Kumar S/o Nirmal Kumar Ram @ Nirmal Ram Resident of VillageArthu, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 184/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is who is husband and others are said to have killed the deceased for dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case as he was not present on the place of occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that when the deceased was taken to the hospital, she died there. Learned counsel next submits that petitioner was working in Delhi and was not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81389 of 2025(4) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 present on the date of occurrence and one Puja Devi who is the elder sister of the deceased has said that the deceased used to stay with her father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law and when the deceased fell ill, she was taken to hospital and thereafter, she died. Petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 20.05.2025. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Biramganj, Rohtas /concerned Court below in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T