Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78507/2025bail granted

Ramvilas Sah @ Rambilash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2022 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ramvilas Sah @ Rambilash Sah S/O Musharu Sah R/O Vill.- Banwaripur, P.S. - Bhagwanpur, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Piyush Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2022, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 263.160 liters liquor was recovered from Magic Pick-up.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was rejected by a co-ordinate

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78507 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.11.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 73088 of 2024. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the vehicle in question and he has no knowledge regarding the goods loaded on the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2022.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T