Nand Kishor Prasad @ Nand Kishor Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2385 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2023 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nand Kishor Prasad @ Nand Kishor Prasad Singh, male, aged about 49 years, Son of Late Yogendra Prasad, Resident of Kodaria Ward No.- 1, Mahna Tola, P.S -Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga Bihar 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga Bihar 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, District- Samastipur Bihar 6.

The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Rosera, Samastipur, District- Samastipur Bihar 7.

The Police Inspector, Circle Rosera, District- Samstipur Bihar 8.

THe Officer-in-Charge of Bibhutipur Police Station, District- Samastipur Bihar 9.

The Investigation Officer of the Bibhutipur Police Station, Case No. 359/2023 Bibhutipur Police Station, District- Samastipur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 27-01-2025 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2385 of 2024(6) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 to withdraw the present petition with a view to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum.

2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

3. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

4. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the petitioner.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J) (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) Gaurav Kumar/- U T