← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23637/2019disposed

Ramashish Mahato, v. Lalit Narayan Mithila University

2019-11-29The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23637 of 2019 ====================================================== Ramashish Mahato, Son of Late Turantu Mahato, Resident of Village-Sihma, P.S. Matihani, District-Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Lalit Narayan Mithila University Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar.

2.

The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

3.

The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4.

Inspector of Colleges, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5.

State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Principal Secretary, Cabinet (Vigilance) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binodanand Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh ( Ga12 ) Mr. Md. Nadeem Seraj, Adv (L.N.M.U.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Through this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents for a proper and independent inquiry into the various irregularities and misappropriation of funds in Ram Lakhan Singh Ram Swarup Mandal College, Shivajee Nagar, P.O.-

Patna High Court CWJC No.23637 of 2019(2) dt.29-11-2019 2/2 Rajour Rambhadrapur, District- Samastipur, a college affiliated to L.N. Mithila University.

After some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he shall be content if the petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned, including Vigilance Department, seeking appropriate action.

Needless to add that the authority concerned shall consider and decide the petitioner's request, of which we are hopeful, expeditiously and in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the liberty aforesaid.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U