Jayram Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.828 of 2025 ====================================================== Jayram Singh Son of Rajendra Mandal, Resident of Village- Bathnaha Panchayat- Sripur Gahar, P.S.- Kanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Addl. Chief Secretary Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, District- Samastipur. 3.
The Deputy Development Commissioner, District- Samastipur. 4.
The Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar, Samastipur. 5.
The Block Development Officer, Block Khanpur, District- Samastipur. 6.
The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Block- Khanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raja Ram Mishra For the Respondent/s :
Mr. AAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 07-02-2025 The petitioner is aggrieved by the misappropriation of public fund in purchase and installation of R.O. water filter machines and sanitary pad machines in five schools at the level of Mukhia and Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Sripur Gahar in
Patna High Court CWJC No.828 of 2025 dt.07-02-2025 2/3 the district of Samastipur. It has also been urged that the procurement of those water filter machines and sanitary pad machines could be done at low cost but after charging higher cost, low quality machines have been supplied. 2.
It appears that the matter was taken cognizance of by the Panchayati Raj Officer, who had directed the Block Development Officer; Khanpur, Samastipur to look into the matter but the enquiry has not reached any logical conclusion.
3.
Under the aforesaid circumstance, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the District Magistrate, Samastipur with specific instances of misappropriation and bungling of public fund by the aforesaid Panchayat functionaries within a period of two weeks, who in turn would be under an obligation to have the matter inquired into and ensure that such bungling is not done. If at all it is found that the accusation by the petitioner is correct, necessary sequel directions/action shall be issued by the District Magistrate, Samastipur,
Patna High Court CWJC No.828 of 2025 dt.07-02-2025 3/3 4.
With the aforenoted direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sunilkumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 10.02.2025 Transmission Date 10.02.2025