Rameshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19511 of 2024 ====================================================== Rameshwar Prasad S/o Late Jamadar Prasad Resident of Village- Mahodipur, Tola Bhat, P.O. Chaita Chailabhar, P.S. Manjhaulia, District-West Champaran, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Secretary, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Joint Secretary, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Deputy Secretary, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 7.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Commissionery, Muzaffarpur. 8.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 9.

The Manager, Bettiah Estate, Bettiah.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikas Ratan Bharti, Adv.

For the Respondent no.9 :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Swapnil Singh, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 07-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 01.07.2019 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 8150/2011, a representation has been submitted by the petitioner before Respondent No. 9 i.e. Manager, Bettiah Estate, Bettiah vide Annexure 'P/26' dated 26.12.2023 which is still pending, therefore, it is prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CWJC No.19511 of 2024(2) dt.07-01-2025 2/2 the petition may be disposed of directing Respondent No. 9 to consider and decide the same within a stipulated period fixed by this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of directing Respondent No. 9 i.e. Manager, Bettiah Estate, Bettiah to decide the representation dated 26.12.2023 of the petitioner which is annexed as Annexure 'P/26' in this petition as early as possible within a period of 45 days from today in accordance with relevant rules and laws, if already not decided.

5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) tusharika/- U