Shailendra Rai @ Shailendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80333 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Shailendra Rai @ Shailendra Kumar Son of Shivjee Rai Resident of villageLauwan, ps- Isuapur, dist- Saran at Chapra 2.
Ranjeet Rai @ Ranjeet Kumar Son of Shivjee Rai Resident of villageLauwan, ps- Isuapur, dist- Saran at Chapra 3.
sanjit Rai @ Sanjeet Kumar son of vikrama Rai Resident of VillageSadhwara, ps- Isuapur, Dist- Saran at Chapra 4.
Rohit Kumar son of Uday prasad Resident of Village- Sadhwara, psIsuapur, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar Tiwary, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 191(2), 190, 296, 333, 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of five cases and petitioner 2 and 3 has antecedent of three cases while petitioner no. 4 is a person of clean antecedent. It is next submitted that criminal antecedent
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80333 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/3 of the petitioners are under the excise act. It is further submitted that once a accused is implicated in a case related to excise the police mechanically implicates.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner came and assaulted him and his brother and informant suffered injury on head and the reason for the occurrence is non payment of ransom of Rs. 1 lakh. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted on account of dispute relating to fishing an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other and from side of the petitioner Isuapur P.S. Case No. 82/2025 came to be instituted against the informant and even injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80333 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T