Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77993/2025bail rejected

Md. Shahzad @ Md. Shehzad Sheikh @ Md. Shezad Seikh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77993 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Shahzad @ Md. Shehzad Sheikh @ Md. Shezad Seikh Son Of Md. Irshad Resident Of Village -Sakri Shibotar Tola P.S -Sakri District -Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025, dated 14.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation, the petitioner and his mother/coaccused (Shahnaj) stabbed on the neck and thigh of Md. Mahtab by knife. They had belief that the victim had love affairs with the sister of the petitioner and daughter of the co-accused for which they have also lodged one FIR bearing Sakri P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77993 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injury report has been issued by a private hospital which is not reliable.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail submitting that the alleged offence is serious in nature and there is specific allegation against the petitioner. He also submits that as per the injury report, there is sharp cut injury on the neck and stab injury on thigh of the victim which is vital part of the body.

8. Considering the serious nature of the allegation and injury report, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T