Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82022/2024bail rejected

Vikram Kumar @ Vikram Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-10Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82022 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2024 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikram Kumar @ Vikram Das S/o Late Musafir Yadav @ Musafir Das R/o vill - Sudhani, P.S. - Paraiya, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case no.28 of 2024, registered under sections 307, 341, 323, 342, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have given a blow with iron rod on the head of one Sanjay Das.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties. There is no repetition of blow and the opinion with respect to the nature of injury is still reserved. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82022 of 2024(4) dt.10-01-2025 2/2

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R, according to which the petitioner is said to have given a blow with an iron rod on the head of Sanjay Das together with the corresponding injury having been found, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T