Bajarang Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79820 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Bajarang Pandey S/o- Ram Akbal Pandey Resident of Village- Akodha, PSDinara District- Rohtas 2.

Angad Pandey S/o- Ramji Pandey Resident of Village- Akodha, PS- Dinara District- Rohtas 3.

Daroga Pandey S/o- Late Ram Akbal Pandey Resident of Village- Akodha, PS- Dinara District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners no. 1 and 2 have antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 3 has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that on 14.06.2025 accused persons came and Guddu Pandey fired but missed thereafter Rajesh Pandey assaulted the brother of the informant by Gandasa causing injury on his head. Further, other accused persons started assaulting but the informant and his side saved themselves by entering the house and Santosh also tried to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79820 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 assault by knife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T