Bijoy Choudhary @ Bijoy Pd. Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72623 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-662 Year-2019 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

BIJOY CHOUDHARY @ BIJOY PD. CHOUDHARY Son of Rajendra Choudhary Resident of House No. B234 Sector 91 P.O-Vijay Nagar, P.SNavi Nagar, District-Faridabad (Haryana). 2.

Karun Devi @ Raja Devi @ Karuna Choudhary Wife of Bijoy Choudhary Resident of House No. B234 Sector 91 P.O-Vijay Nagar, P.S-Navi Nagar, District-Faridabad (Haryana).

3.

Preeti @ Preeti Sings Daughter of Bijoy Choudhary @ Bijoy Pd. Choudhary Resident of House No. B234 Sector 91 P.O-Vijay Nagar, P.S-Navi Nagar, District-Faridabad (Haryana).

4.

Bablu Choudhary @ Bablu Kumar Son of Bijoy Choudhary @ Bijoy Pd. Choudhary Resident of House No. B234 Sector 91 P.O-Vijay Nagar, P.SNavi Nagar, District-Faridabad (Haryana). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the accused persons is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72623 of 2019(2) dt.16-11-2019 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute.Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-inlaw, petitioner no. 3 is nanad and petitioner no. 4 is devar of the victim. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka in connection with Banka (Barahat) P.S. Case No. 662/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T