Parikshan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78760 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2025 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Parikshan Yadav S/o Shibu Yadav R/O- Village- Palibar, Paliwar Nagar Nigam, Ward No.- 18, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Adv Mr. Parikshah Yadav, Adv Mr. Gagan Deo yadav, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute in a cricket match, petitioner assaulted his son by an iron rod causing injury on rib cage, further the petitioner repeated the blow on rib cage, on account of which his son sustained injury and started vomiting and doctor referred him to DMCH for better treatment.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78760 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that the date of occurrence is 30-6-2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 10-7-2025, i.e., after a delay of 10 days which casts aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that on intervention of well-wishers, the parties have compromised as would manifest from the compromise petition, annexed as Annexure2 to the anticipatory bail application. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T