Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72699/2019bail granted

Subodh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72699 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2018 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR Son of Bindeshwari Yadav Resident of VillageGharbandha, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2020 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No. 296 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC.

As per prosecution case, the house of the petitioner was looted by some miscreants taking away Rs. 3,43,649/-, two HHD Machine, a bag containing documents and a mobile phone. The F.I.R. is against unknown persons. Later on, name of the petitioner transpires on the confessional statement of the coaccused. It further appears that he is accused in one more case also of preparation of the dacoity.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. He is in custody for more than five months and in spite of that, he has not been put on TIP.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72699 of 2019(2) dt.13-01-2020 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Araria, in connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No. 296 of 2018, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T