Ravishankar Chouhan @ Rudra Pratap Nonia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40733 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2018 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Ravishankar Chouhan @ Rudra Pratap Nonia, son of Daya Shankar Chouhan @ Daya Chouhan @ Daya Shankar Nonia, resident of villageChandi, Police Station- Chandi, District Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Sarita Bajaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 12-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chandi P.S. Case No.35 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 307 Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against this petitioner that he assaulted the informant with Daab on his waist and other parts of the body. The Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that injury of the informant was found to be simple in nature.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has clean antecedents.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40733 of 2018 (2) dt.12-07-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.35 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 12th, Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T