Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71495 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== VIJAY KUMAR Son of Sakaldeo Thakur Resident of Village - Sanha West, P.S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anuj Kumar,Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Instant petition under Sections 439 and 440 of Criminal Procedure Code has been moved for grant of bail in F.I.R. No. 199 of 2019, dated 27.6.2019, registered at Police Station Sahebpur Kamal under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379/34 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. I have also perused the relevant record of the case, necessary for adjudication of this petition.
On 26th June, 2019 informant Tapesh Kumar got registered a complaint that the accused persons, including 4 boys, had a heated exchange with him and robbed him of Rs.10,000/-, mobile and relevant papers.
2/4 It is seen that the motorcycle allegedly recovered in relation to the crime is neither linked to the accused bail applicant, namely Vijay Kumar not to the incident in question. Investigation is complete. Thus far there is nothing on record to link the accused to the crime in question. T.I.P. has also not been done. The accused is suffering incarceration since 21.7.2019.
Prima facie also it appears that thus far no case against the petitioner is made out indicating his complicity in the alleged crime.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has roots in the society; is not likely to interfere in the investigation or influence any of the witnesses or destroy the evidence; is behind bars since 21.7.2019; no further custodial interrogation is required and he has fully cooperated in the investigation.
Prima facie, nothing is produced to highlight petitioner's direct involvement in the crime. Thus, this Court is of the considered view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of bail. Possibility of false implication, as is so alleged by the petitioner, cannot be ruled out. Also, thus far save and except for naming the
3/4 petitioner in the F.I.R., no evidence corroborative in nature stands recorded by the police. Also, none has come forward to highlight the possible involvement of the petitioner in the crime. On what basis the Investigating Officer could link the accused to the crime is also not emanating from the record. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 199 of 2019, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the
4/4 investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. Any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on the merits of the matter. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) K.C.Jha/- U T