Charitar Yadav @ Charitar Kumar @ Chalitar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79192 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

Charitar Yadav @ Charitar Kumar @ Chalitar Kumar S/o Late Prabhu Yadav R/o Village- Pathlafar, P.S- Sheikhpura, Distt- Sheikhpura 2.

Sharda Devi W/o Late Prabhu Yadav R/o Village- Pathlafar, P.SSheikhpura, Dist- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State.

2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS, 2023') for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners who apprehend arrest in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No.122 of 2025, lodged on 25.04.2025, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/109/ 352 / 351(2)/3(5) of B.N.S. 2023.

3. From the FIR it transpires that FIR has been lodged against three named accused persons including the present petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79192 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the from the FIR itself it becomes crystal clear that whatever be the allegation it is against co-accused Lalu Yadav but against the present petitioners there is no specific rather it is general and omnibus. Counsel submits that antecedent of the petitioners are clean and they are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that in the FIR itself it is indicated that cause of dispute is that the brother of the informant was killed and the accused persons were putting pressure to remove the cases against them and it is due to this reason event has been caused.

6. In this background, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, hence, anticipatory bail application of petitioners is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T