Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80755 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-429 Year-2025 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Ray, S/O Late Hira Lal Ray, R/O Vill.- Basuchak, P.S.- Saraiya, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.429 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 111 of the B.N.S., Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol, one live cartridge and 13 gram of smack was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80755 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The seizure list witnesses are the police personnel and the recovery of contraband, if any, is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.05.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Court-II (NDPS), Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 429 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T