Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85402 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2024 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Yadav Son of Parsuram Yadav R/O Vill.- Churan Bigha, P.S.- Kako, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar.

2.

Parshuram Yadav Son of Late Mahabir Yadav R/O Vill.- Churan Bigha, P.S.- Kako, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar.

3.

Dukhani Devi Wife of Parshuram Yadav R/O Vill.- Churan Bigha, P.S.- Kako, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80(2) and 238(A) of the B.N.S..

3. It is a case of "dowry death". It is alleged that all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including these petitioners, killed daughter of informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely because Petitioner No. 1 is elder brother-in-law, Petitioner No. 2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85402 of 2024(3) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 is father-in-law and Petitioner No. 3 is mother-in-law of the deceased. Petitioners are victim of over implication. There is no specific allegation of demand of dowry or torture. They are separate in mess & property and have got no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. Thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad, in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 198 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T