← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82477/2025bail rejected

Savitri Devi @ Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82477 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-679 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Savitri Devi @ Meena Devi Wife of Late Jageshwar Choudhary Resident of village - Mastpura, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rajesh Kumar Son of Late Laxmi Narayan R/O village - New Godown Lane, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyaveer Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Complaint Case No. 679 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 147, 148, 149, 386, 341, 323, 109, 113, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per complaint petition, all the named accused persons, including this petitioner, forcibly took possession over the ancestral house of the complainant, demanded R. 5 lacs ransom and threatened to sell the house. It is further alleged that the accused persons also looted household articles, utensils, etc. worth Rs. 30,000/-. Petitioner has got three criminal antecedents

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82477 of 2025(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 of similar nature.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is an old lady and has falsely been implicated in this case due to earlier disputes with regard to the house, between the parties.

5. Learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedents, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T