Varun Kumar Sharma @ Chulho Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38411 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -766 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Varun Kumar Sharma @ Chulho Sharma, Son of Ramdeo Sharma, Resident of Village- Kananwa, Post- Amrita, P.S.- Sonbarsa, DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 766 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case is that the informant along with his son and daughter in law had gone to a clinic, where petitioner and one co-accused came there and had a talk with the daughter in law of the informant and it is alleged that when the informant and his son went inside the clinic, they kidnapped the daughter in law of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that out and out false and frivolous allegation has been levelled against the petitioner and he has nothing to do with the kidnapping of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38411 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 daughter in law of the informant, which will appear from the fact that soon after the occurrence, informant has came to the petitioner's house, where he was found present and had there been a hand of the petitioner in the kidnapping of the daughter in law of the informant, he must not have been present in his house. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the girl has still not been recovered. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the petitioner, if so desire, may surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T