Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1111/2024bail rejected

Arbind Yadav @ Mina v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-21Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1111 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2023 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== ARBIND YADAV @ MINA SON OF KAPIL YADAV R/O VILLAGERAMPUR, P.S.- WARISALIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Warisliganj P.S. Case no. 289 of 2023 registered under sections 307, 341, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is stated that as a result of firing resorted to by the petitioner, the informant sustained gunshot injury in his right thigh.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the FIR. There is no repetition of firing and the injury is on a non-vital part of the body. The petitioner is in custody since 19.6.2023 and chargesheet has been submitted in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1111 of 2024(4) dt.21-03-2024 2/2 the case.

5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. according to which as a result of firing resorted to by the petitioner, the informant sustained gunshot injury in his right thigh, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months or on framing of charge whichever is later. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T