Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38650 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -207 Year- 2015 Thana -DULHIN BAZAR District- PATNA ====================================================== Amit Kumar, S/o Wakil Yadav, R/o Dulhin Bazar, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 207 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the written report. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-accused Jitendra Kumar @ Lola in his confessional statement. It has further been submitted that co-accused Surendra Prasad and Ram Pravesh Singh @ Ram Pravesh Yadav have been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 39870 of 2016 along with Cr. Misc. 44808 of 2016. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38650 of 2018 (2) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 207 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Piyush Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Danapur, Distt. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T