Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3846/2024bail granted

Md. Meraj Imam @ Rinku @ Meraj Imam v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3846 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2019 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Meraj Imam @ Rinku @ Meraj Imam Akhtar Imam R/O VillageKhalilpura, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. At Present R/O VillageMurgiyachak, P.S.- Janipur (Jarinpur), District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 120(B), 224, 353, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to be the assailant of the deceased. He is in jail since 11.07.2019. Altogether there are 18 charge sheeted witnesses

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that few witnesses have been examined. He further submits that right of speedy trial is also available to the accused which is being violated.

5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3846 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 prayer for bail.

6. Considering the fact that petitioner is in jail for about five years and trial will take time, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Danapur, Patna/concerned Court below in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 561 of 2019 subject to condition that:- 7(i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented through himself or through his lawyer on each and every date fixed by the Court and on absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, the bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

7(ii). One of the bailor should be the blood relative of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T